28/11/2025

Kind Words: Can One Return to the Prescribed Path of Marriage After Straying from It?

자리다 한마디
Alternative titles: A Word from Warm Heart / One Warm Word / Warm Words
SBS, 2013, 20 episodes
Genre: drama, family, marriage, melodrama
Written by: Ha Myeong-hee 하명희
Directed by: Choi Yeong-hoon 최영훈


* Warning: This post contains spoilers! *


Based on its title, I was mostly expecting a rom-com; therefore, I was somewhat surprised by the heavy themes explored in the series Kind Words (original title: One Warm Word). The drama’s conceptual premise is that while the sum of a partnership between two independent people is 1+1=2, this changes in the case of spouses, strangely becoming 1+1=3—implying that marital commitment carries a certain surplus, a kind of added value. Consequently, it places two marriages in focus during a state of crisis, as one member of each couple has become involved in a romantic affair with the other. The revelation of this entanglement impacts not only their own lives and those of their spouses but also the lives of everyone in their orbit.


(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


As long as the institution of marriage exists, the subject remains perennial, making Kind Words relevant simply by virtue of its theme. However, it becomes even more fascinating when examined in light of the following facts. Although criminal penalties for adultery were once in effect in Western countries as well, those laws were abolished everywhere by the mid-to-late 20th century. This was not the case in South Korea, which was the last among OECD member countries to maintain the criminalization of adultery for a long time, an offense punishable by up to two years in prison. Under the law introduced in 1953, approximately 1,000 to 3,000 lawsuits were filed annually. A core element of these trials was the requirement to prove sexual intercourse between the parties, which was essential for a conviction. Proving this was, of course, often difficult and questionable; the methods employed could be humiliating and intrusive regarding individual civil liberties. Although the operation of private investigation firms is prohibited in the country, their role was taken over by "information service providers" who followed, monitored, photographed, and documented the lives of suspects—often commissioned not only by spouses but also by lawyers or the prosecution. Besides obtaining indirect evidence (witness testimonies, credit card data, hotel registrations, message exchanges), the harshest tool was "red-handed" apprehension. This involved spouses—sometimes joined by relatives and/or police support—bursting in on the suspects, who, once caught, were routinely pilloried in public. However, men and women were not affected equally, with the latter suffering more. Following social shifts, public opinion increasingly questioned the validity of this system. Serious social debates ensued after certain extreme cases, leading the Constitutional Court to address the issue in 2008 and 2009. However, the law was finally abolished only in early 2015. Even at that time, 600 trials were still in progress, which were dismissed upon the repeal, and the possibility for retrials of earlier cases was opened.

From the drama's perspective, this is interesting because it was released during these social debates, nearing the repeal of the article, yet the criminal regulations were still in effect. Thus, almost every element of the reality described above can be found within it. Kind Words is resolutely pro-marriage, but fortunately, it avoids justifying this through rigid conventions. Instead, it invites the viewer on a long and not necessarily comfortable journey into the realm of individual and relational psychology. A clever solution must be mentioned here: although the characters come from various strata of society, they all possess sufficient intellectual and emotional intelligence to ensure the story is driven not by raw impulses but by a desire for insight.



(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


The catalyst of events is the relationship between Na Eun-jin (Han Hye-jin) and Yoo Jae-hak (Ji Jin-hee), whom we meet at the very moment of their final breakup. We see two sympathetic people who are clearly on the same wavelength. Despite the drama depicting the ostracizing and contemptuous attitude of society—and the fact that the protagonists themselves feel guilty—it does not judge them, nor does it absolve them. It bypasses the overt question of whether two committed people have the right to "irregular" feelings, but answers it indirectly precisely by revealing the processes that led to their connection. One thing, however, is emphasized—which can truly be understood based on the context provided earlier: no physical contact occurred between the parties (thus, they did not commit a crime). Yet, this is exactly what Jae-hak’s wife constantly probes, confessing that she would have preferred it if her husband’s affair had been merely a flare-up of "animal instincts" rather than an emotional attraction. For the latter is far more uncomfortable, as it raises the agonizing question: "What was there about me that couldn't be loved?" or, "Did I play a role in how we got here?"



(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


The relationship between Yoo Jae-hak and Song Mi-kyeong (Kim Ji-soo) may resemble traditional Korean marriages, yet it isn't an arranged one but rather a rare "Cinderella-type" union. Jae-hak is the head of a corporate fortune inherited from his family, while Mi-kyeong is living her realized dreams, doing everything in her power to repay fate for granting her such a husband and lifestyle. Having already raised two children who are currently studying abroad, the couple is free to navigate the exploration and management of their crisis. Initially, they have no idea what has happened to them, as both had performed their assumed marital roles to perfection. They hadn't even noticed the "loneliness for two" they had constructed, let alone felt its discomfort. They must wake up to reality, which is no easy task. At first, both are in denial; the wife seeks a scapegoat, and punishing her husband becomes almost an obsession. The husband remains completely blind to his wife's unspoken problems, a situation exacerbated by the truly shrewish nature of his mother, Mrs. Choo, who lives with them and relentlessly torments Mi-kyeong. In this dynamic, one can detect the traces of Confucian family structures: the emotional emptiness of partnerships, the abuse of authority by the elderly (the husband barely contradicts his mother once), and the discrimination among family members based on wealth or social rank—albeit in a weakened and bypassable form. Yet, while they torment each other, reaching a point where divorce seems the only way out, another process begins: through their negotiations, they begin to marvel at each other’s true personalities, which they hadn't known until then. Mi-kyeong sees the man’s sensitive soul, and Jae-hak watches with surprise as his wife rediscovers her womanhood—and it seems he finds himself (re)attracted to this woman.



(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


The situation is different in Na Eun-jin’s family, who are slightly younger, more independent, and have a young daughter. Perhaps we can again attribute to Confucianism the self-reproach Eun-jin inflicts upon herself after defining her emotional bond with the third party as just as adulterous as a physical affair. Her guilt is only worsened by seeing the pain caused to the innocent Mi-kyeong, an emotional state escalated by the chain reaction of how her affair impacts her loved ones. However, there is a crucial element in the drama: the precursor to Eun-jin’s "straying" was the infidelity of her husband, Kim Seong-soo (Lee Sang-woo), which she could only forgive in words for years, but never in her true feelings, making her unable to perceive her husband’s genuine efforts and suffering. The emotional relationship of this couple has been impulsive from the start, moving between intense extremes. It is a story of two highly sensitive people who must realize that the emotion between them never vanished; it just got lost somewhere, and they must find it. They, too, reach the idea of divorce, but two powerful forces work against it: their common child, who reflects the consequences of their actions, and Seong-soo’s capacity for insight, as he recognizes that the current situation is rooted in his own past mistake. Their daughter, Kim Yoon-jeong (Lee Chae-mi), is a remarkably talented child actress; though her dialogue is written to be somewhat too "grown-up" and can sound slightly jarring, it always achieves its intended purpose because of it.



(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


The two families intersect at one more point: the relationship between Song Min-soo (Park Seo-joon) and Na Eun-yeong (Han Groo). Min-soo also grew up in the family of his sister, Mi-kyeong, and Jae-hak considers him almost his own child. The young man's character demonstrates how deeply the family patterns and experiences witnessed in childhood influence our lives: Min-soo struggles within the grip of childhood traumas and the experiences of his ready-made new family life. Throughout the twenty episodes, the creators employ realistic dramatic tools, only rarely yielding to the pull of melodrama—mostly in the dramatization of this younger couple's story, though not in a way that is overly distracting.



(Author’s screenshot from Kind Words.)


What is a true delicacy of the drama, however, is its portrayal of the older generation’s involvement. With the presence of Eun-jin’s parents, the story becomes a multi-generational diagnostic report. The elderly parents, Kim Na-ra (Go Doo-shim) and Na Dae-ho (Yoon Joo-sang), are modern thinkers who do not wish to interfere in their children’s lives. They do not hide their opinions, yet they stand by them no matter what, and if they happen to make a mistake themselves, they admit it. However, their situation is not without pain; on one hand, they constantly reflect on their own lived lives, and on the other, they are tormented by a sense of helplessness while witnessing their children's suffering. Nevertheless, they are inexhaustible resources, whose support extends generously to their "adopted" children—their children's spouses.

In the sea of Korean melodramas, Kind Words is a true gem of a drama that stands out by being deeply grounded in reality. Although its impact must have been particularly significant at the time of its release, its content remains valid, heart-wrenching, and thought-provoking to this day. Even if views on marriage have changed significantly in the accelerated time since then, I believe we need not dispute the validity of 1+1=3 if we replace "marriage" with "taking responsibility for the person we love." Kind Words does exactly that, occasionally formulating truths that may seem like clichés, yet remain unquestionable:

"It isn't over when you get what you want.
That is only the beginning." 








Disclaimer: All images used in this article from Kind Words are owned by SBS and are used here under Fair Use for the purpose of criticism and scholarly review.


.  .  .  


This article was originally written in Hungarian for Ricemegatron Expert Film Blog and subsequently translated into English for Ricemegatron Expert: Korean Screen Insights. The English version was created with the assistance of Gemini AI, focusing on preserving the original tone, structure, and critical style of the author.
























15/11/2025

Evilive: When the Evil Awakening Within the Disciple Outshines the Master

악인전기
ENA, Genie TV / 2023 / 10 episodes
Genres: drama, film noir, crime, thriller
Written by Jung Seo-hee, Lee Seung-hoon
Directed by Kim Jeong-min, Kim Sung-min





(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


It is a rare occasion when I find the English title of a drama much more fitting than the original Korean one, but that is precisely the case here. The original title, Biography of a Villain, sounds decidedly dull compared to EVILIVE, even though such a word does not officially exist. First and foremost, it is a palindrome: whether read forward or backward, it remains EVILIVE. It is easy to see that this is a visual fusion of two words—properly, EVIL LIVE—suggesting that evil exists, that it awakens.

Beyond the linguistic play, there is another vital characteristic to the word being its own mirror image: it becomes the perfect expression of the imagery evoked by the title, summoning the drama’s two protagonists. We see lawyer Han Dong-soo (Shin Ha-kyung) staring down mobster Seo Do-yeong (Kim Young-kwang), and after a while, we cannot decide which of them is the monster and which is the one fighting it—who is dragging whom into the dizzying abyss, or who is falling in of their own accord—as we will eventually hear in the famous Nietzsche quote cited in the series.



(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


"Small-time"—that is what they call the lawyer who, exhausted after a three-year suspension, begs for assignments from jailbirds. "Small-time"—that is what they call the gangster just thrown into the slammer, unable to step out from the shadow of the big dogs who exploit him. These two people meet in a somewhat awkward but seemingly ordinary client-attorney relationship. However, neither of them suspects the forces brewing within the other. The film itself foreshadows something of the expected events: let us observe the rhyming scenes involving the flies. The gangster terrifies the lawyer with the way he strikes down the loathsome pest. Later, the lawyer is most surprised by himself when he manages to catch the buzzing beast annoying him. But he smashes it against the windowpane as if it were not a fly in his grip, but his employer.

Han Dong-soo was sidelined precisely because of his sense of justice, and as if fate had conspired against him, he suffers one humiliation after another—affecting not only him but his wife as well. When it becomes clear that the tools of the law will get him nowhere, after an initial attempt to flee, he says yes to the gangster’s commission. From the first moment, he is aware of Seo Do-yeong’s aggressive nature, which initially fills him with dread.

Their first operation ends in a blood-curdling yet almost tragi-comic fashion due to the carnage unleashed by the now-released Seo Do-yeong, a massacre that nearly claims the lives of the lawyer and his younger brother. Han Beom-jae (Shin Jae-ha) did nothing more than recommend his Big Bro to Seo through a friend and assist the cornered Dong-soo as a technical expert. Yet, through this, he becomes irrevocably entangled in an affair that could not be further from his nature. However, for the lawyer, terror brought out a level of creativity that allowed him to convince Do-yeong that he could still be of use to him.

Though the characters of the two protagonists are like fire and water, they are mutually fascinated by each other, even if they won't admit it to themselves. Within the endlessly fastidious, hardworking, and duty-bound lawyer—who is professionally on solid ground—Do-yeong sees the missing link for his plans and takes him under his wing. Meanwhile, through his connection with the gangster, Dong-soo gets a taste of a life he never even dared to dream of—until now. The common denominator of their alliance is that both want to break out of their circumstances, and individually, they have already gathered enough painful motivation to do so. Moreover, their enemies are the same.



(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


Seo Do-yeong is an exceptionally fascinating character. Most of the time, he shuffles around sloppily in his slippers and is hardly what you’d call talkative. He is a handsome young man with an athletic build, but behind his apparent nonchalance, he is always ready to strike or defend. He explodes at the most unexpected moments, his every sense relentlessly attuned to everything and everyone around him; as a result, he recognizes danger from the slightest cues. He is a rather clever strategist, yet you can never tell what he is thinking, and he usually comes up with quite startling ideas. At his core, he is as motionless as a sphinx; the most terrifying thing about him is that it's nearly impossible to distinguish his rare friendly expression from his more habitual threatening one.

Han Dong-soo, meanwhile, quickly realizes that Do-yeong needs him, as he manages—somewhat on a "blind luck" basis—to wring out an idea that secures the financial foundations for the gangster's independence. The business takes off, and everything could even end well if the lawyer didn’t waver in his intention to quit once his task is done—especially since even the mafia boss would let him go.

However, it is the sense of inferiority, experienced as a shared grievance by both, that eventually triggers their conflict. While Do-yeong is in the process of overcoming this, relishing his newly acquired power, he confesses to Dong-soo how frustrated he felt being exploited by bosses who owed everything to him. He has no inkling that Dong-soo feels exactly the same way toward him and perceives his own position as undignified.

The lawyer gets a taste of blood. Every perk or obtainable opportunity pushes him toward wanting more, but more importantly, toward wanting everything only for himself. Do-yeong does not lose sight of this slow transformation, and despite showing almost no outward sign of emotion, we somehow feel his disappointment. Do-yeong is an infinitely lonely figure who could never trust anyone. Perhaps it isn't even written into the script, but Kim Young-kwang portrays through tiny tremors that the lawyer could have been his friend. But Dong-soo turned against him, so Do-yeong shows him his place using a horrific mafia method: a unique blood pact is sealed, in which the lawyer’s hands are bloody while the mobster’s remain clean.



(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)



In the meantime, power struggles naturally unfold, focusing on individuals from state administration, the political elite, or the law and police force, who are simultaneously part of the underworld. Retributions and gang wars color the internal struggles, in which Dong-soo increasingly finds himself—or rather, a newly discovered self, at whom his family gazes with growing estrangement.



(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


The gangster Do-yeong is a terrifying figure without inhibitions, while Dong-soo, in his relationship with him, is nothing more than the dog that bites the hand that feeds it. It is sickening to watch how he utilizes his legal knowledge and what remains of his outward humanism to drive Do-yeong out of his own domain. In truth, there is no longer a difference between them; both are infinitely corrupt. Or rather, perhaps there is one distinction: the story suggests that Do-yeong has an innate antisocial personality, entirely insensitive to human relationships and rules (for instance, he invades and takes possession of private living spaces without a second thought), which, of course, is not an excusable sin. Dong-soo, however, steps out of the human normative system he previously accepted and represented; moreover, he tramples over his loved ones and those who helped him—initially using his own grievances as self-justification for his transformation, but eventually ceasing to care about absolution altogether, embracing the darkest territories of his being. The double life of the lawyer that we see at the end of the story is truly stomach-turning, and we feel it is a touch of poetic justice that the warning of the Nietzsche quote is delivered from Do-yeong’s mouth.

The writing duo, Jung Seo-hee and Lee Seung-hoon, have delivered an excellent, twist-filled, and detailed screenplay rich in well-developed characters—remarkably so, considering this is the first series for both. The directors, Kim Jung-min and Kim Sung-soo, made excellent use of the material, filming a fast-paced and tense production. Relying on great actors, they told the story of internal shifts through sensitive close-ups, often signaling the story's changes in direction through these alone.



(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)



Shin Ha-kyun’s lawyer undergoes a slow but massive transformation, every element of which is infinitely deliberate—from his voice and movements to his attire—all precisely aligned with the stages of his change. Kim Young-kwang has simply perfected the character of Seo Do-yeong; whenever he appears, he dominates the screen. His charisma is incredibly powerful; the glint in his eye commands authority and, when necessary, evokes terror. The slowed-down manner of speaking that Kim employs fits him perfectly. I wrote about his sloppiness, but he can be exactly the opposite—who could forget that entrance at the head of his army when he goes to offer his condolences? We see him in numerous action scenes as well, in which he is swift and ruthless, always possessing a certain animality, but with the commanding dignity characteristic of apex predators. Torn between the two is the drama's only decent character, the lawyer's younger brother, played by Shin Jae-ha in a sensitive performance.




(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


(Author’s screenshot from Evilive.)


Most of the many supporting characters are given individual identities; among them, I would highlight only one. Within the ranks of the mobsters, it was interesting to see Bae Na-ra, who looked very much at home in the role of an elegant and firm gangster—a role that contrasts sharply with his soft and sensitive debut character in D.P.

There are no lulls in the ten episodes of Evilive; it maintains our excitement throughout. Of course, we can roughly guess what must happen, but fortunately, we do not foresee everything. The drama does not moralize; it leanly demonstrates the awakening of evil through events, leaving us to draw our own conclusions from this story devoid of positive heroes.









Disclaimer: All images used in this article from Evilive are owned by ENA / Genie TV and are used here under Fair Use for the purpose of criticism and scholarly review.


.  .  .  


This article was originally written in Hungarian for Ricemegatron Expert Film Blog and subsequently translated into English for Ricemegatron Expert: Korean Screen Insights. The English version was created with the assistance of Gemini AI, focusing on preserving the original tone, structure, and critical style of the author.






























09/11/2025

Trigger: The Soul Fires When the Gun Resounds

트리거
Netflix, 2025, 10 episodes
Genres: drama, thriller, action
Written by Kwon Oh-seung (권오승)
Directed by Kwon Oh-seung (권오승)



* Warning: This post contains spoilers! *




Trigger is a high-impact and  eye-catching series, even if it may not fully meet every maximalist expectation. While it is categorized as an action-thriller, mystery, or crime film, I believe the label of "social disaster film" or simply "drama" would suit it much better—colored by the aforementioned genre elements and embedded in a moralizing and cruel drama that toys with a dystopian vision of the future.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)



Kwon Oh-seung directed his own story, and he boldly poses questions that are difficult to answer. As a filmmaker, Kwon’s age of 39 is not considered old; at this stage, one fortunately still possesses the vigorous energy of youth and, in lucky cases, a pure—though perhaps slightly naive—faith. In the light of this faith, one believes the world can be saved and changed, even as the destructive power of the dark side is already visible. I feel this respectable perspective in the drama, and it should not be underestimated. Without it, the world would not move forward—or if it moves nowhere, this force is what halts the dominance of self-consuming tendencies, and as such, the key to our continuous survival lies within it. Looking at the drama’s conclusion through this lens, I cannot be dissatisfied with it. To produce a cynical smile, one would need to gather much more bitter life experience along with reaching a more advanced age. I wish for Kwon to never acquire such experiences, and that the common bitterness accompanying an "understanding" of how the world works—which may enable a nuanced portrayal of the irredeemable but at the cost of a sense of nihilism—never dawns upon him. How much better is the gentle "coming of wisdom" that emphasizes a love for life and aiding the forces of good! Perhaps this has nothing to do with Trigger, yet for some reason, it came to mind in connection with the drama.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)



Kwon’s drama has a positive resonance, even though the road leading there is shrouded in dark shadows. The "road" creates a linear impression, and it appears that the standalone stories of the individual episodes form the elements of a garland. At times, they seem to repeat with minor modifications, which indeed reduces the drama’s tension by making the upcoming steps predictable. Yet, we can also view it as fitting pieces of a puzzle together—whichever element we touch, it will help outline the same whole, the same overall picture. Thus, the individual cases are not merely excerpts of a life-feeling permeating the entire society but serve as reinforcing elements of a compendium to support how many ways we can be tormented. The individual levels of this state show only personal variations, and those in more extreme situations merely possess a higher danger index than others (victims of both physical and mental abuse, the overworked, those subjected to neglect, unfair treatment, etc.).

There is a "trigger" in all of us, the drama suggests. We can perhaps make this image more universally understood through the other meaning of trigger: to cause or initiate—the kind of accumulation where "one’s thread snaps" at a certain point when the level of frustration reaches the threshold of the unbearable. The drama’s fundamental idea is that we have created a world where the tension index constantly hovers at this limit, which naturally varies from person to person; therefore, it is unpredictable where and how individual "snaps" will occur. Although this high-strung society is localized in South Korea within the drama, the story could be set in any similar, primarily liberal-capitalist country where the only indicator of worth is success, and those who do not perform well are deemed rejects. The theoretical question, then, is: what happens if we place an instant tension-reliever like a gun into people’s hands? Yet, for this very reason, and despite all appearances, Trigger is not about gun ownership; it provides a diagnostic report of a sick society.

This explosive society is granted two extraordinary protagonists in the drama, and as a result of their opposing worldviews, one seeks to destroy aggression while the other strives to unleash it. While the drama as a whole functions like a theoretical construct—including these two figures—both are written with remarkable lifelikeness, and brought to life even more so by the actors. Neither is strictly good or bad, nor more likable or detestable than the other; the difference lies in their respective responses to their circumstances—and one must not forget who was, or was not, there to help them in making those choices.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)



For a time, their life stories run almost parallel. As a child, the family of police officer Lee Do (Kim Nam-gil) was wiped out during a robbery. He was prevented from becoming a child killer by his current superior, who took the orphaned boy in and raised him, passing on a value system that favors legal justice over vigilantism. Lee Do’s story took a strange turn, and we can see he is not a policeman of average training. He previously fought criminals as a sniper for the special forces, and after no fewer than 99 casualties, he decided never to pick up a weapon again, struggling with PTSD as a result. One can infer, however, that he will be forced to reconsider this decision.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


The background of Moon Baek (Kim Young-kwang) is no less burdened. After being abandoned by his parents, he ended up in the United States in the hands of organ traffickers. There, he was noticed by the head of a company engaged in illegal arms trade, who took the child in. Moon has matured into a handsome, daring young man who is in no way inferior to our reckless policeman in terms of audacity. But life does not spare him now either; a cancerous illness allows him only a limited amount of time, which only further fuels his unflagging thirst for revenge—or, from his perspective, his drive for justice. He disguises his diabolical plan as business activity: he intends to turn the country that made his life hell into a hell itself by placing weapons into the hands of marginalized, utterly desperate people, even manipulating them into using them. At first, only to a few, then indiscriminately to anyone. He deflects responsibility with the self-justification that it is an individual decision whether one actually pulls the trigger.

A country that strictly restricts gun ownership is stunned to face the proliferating, bloody individual and mass retaliations. Lee and Moon, seemingly tossed together by chance, could even make an excellent duo, but at first, they play a cat-and-mouse game until their cards are laid bare. Lee constantly thwarts Moon’s plans, which is precisely why Moon pulls that certain trigger at one point. At this stage, the focus shifts from a police case to a broader horizon: gun ownership suddenly becomes a matter of social debate and political inquiry. Moon Baek and his underworld associates ramp up the events, leading to clashes between pro-gun and anti-gun groups, and the country is swept to the brink of a state of emergency.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)



In the meantime, we witness a parallel story that illuminates the inner workings of the country’s underworld. The frustrations permeating the visible surface of society are equally present here; the low-level gangsters of the hierarchy harbor just as much desperate rage as their law-abiding fellow citizens. Yet, there is a grotesque sobriety to them that seems to be vanishing from "normal society." It is from the mouth of a mobster that we must hear that they do not want to use guns, for two reasons: primarily because it would authorize the authorities to gun them down without a second thought, and secondly because where there are many weapons, the military might have cause to intervene—and as South Korean history specifically shows, little good ever comes of that. Therefore, they would rather hand over the weapons docked with them, which only bring them trouble, to the authorities.



(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)


(Author’s screenshot from Trigger.)



For "normal" people to reach the same conclusion, a chaotic bloodshed is required. This is also the final showdown between Lee and Moon, which, despite its concreteness, is rather symbolic. The question running through the drama is not a new one: does the person who takes up a weapon not, in fact, destroy themselves with it? Moon’s fate seems to fulfill this, while Lee becomes the embodiment of the path leading out of the cataclysm. He saves a little boy who seems to be his childhood self—and the photograph in which he protects the child with his own body becomes a symbol of a better world. It is equally symbolic that he is the one to raise the next generation. Can we do anything other than root for him?

Perhaps it is evident from my description that the drama has a certain didactic intent, a desire to "enlighten" minds, which does not necessarily work in its favor. At the same time, it carries an important message for South Korea, positioned at one extreme of the attitude toward gun ownership, as well as for the United States at the other. An equal sign is almost placed between the two, as they are distinguished only by the difference in access to firearms. The "thread" is stretched to the breaking point in both societies; however, the trigger is only one tool for releasing that tension, so I leave it to everyone’s imagination what else it might be replaced with.

It is not difficult to deduce our real task: to replace our current world, which causes discomfort for everyone, with something in which we can feel more at home. And while Trigger may not be a flawless drama, its message is perfect.

The first four episodes of Kwon Oh-seung’s series possess a sweeping momentum, and despite its very uncomfortable atmosphere, it nonetheless sucks the viewers in. Toward the middle, it loses some of its drive, but the visuals remain impactful throughout, and the action sequences are excellently executed and filmed. The individual work of the two actors and their complementary interplay in the two characters cannot be praised enough. Every actor infuses the various characters appearing in individual cases with unique flavors, while they all share one common trait: the vivid portrayal of a nervous system stretched to the limit.

Trigger is a bold undertaking, and I wish us many more like it.









Disclaimer: All images used in this article from Trigger are owned by Netflix and are used here under Fair Use for the purpose of criticism and scholarly review.


.  .  .  


This article was originally written in Hungarian for Ricemegatron Expert Film Blog and subsequently translated into English for Ricemegatron Expert: Korean Screen Insights. The English version was created with the assistance of Gemini AI, focusing on preserving the original tone, structure, and critical style of the author.

























02/11/2025

Mickey 17: "Who Said Bluffing Was Only for Humans?"






(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


From his very first feature film (Barking Dogs Never Bite, 2000), it has been clear that Bong Joon-ho is no stranger to black humor. He is preoccupied with class differences, politics, and, fitting for a humanities scholar with a degree in sociology, his films are without exception social deep-drillings, mediated through a lens dipped in vitriol—or rather, through cameras that capture a satirical vision. He presents our world in warped mirrors that often provoke laughter, yet the aftertaste is mostly bitter, as we experienced in the most refined form of this method while watching Parasite (2019). And besides... he loves animals. Furthermore, in a cinematic sense, he is a homo ludens (a playful man), who enjoys playing with film genres and transgressing their supposedly stone-carved rules—a trait he certainly does not share alone within the camp of Korean filmmakers.

While he previously signed prestigious, internationally successful works by kneading together elements of social drama, crime film (Memories of Murder, 2003), horror (The Host, 2006), or thriller (Mother, 2009)—all of which were domestically focused films—his more recent, Western-produced works have seen a shift in perspective: questioning global issues, there emerged science fiction, an interest in ecology, and the theme of researcher responsibility (already foreshadowed by The Host). However, these creations all sketched dystopian visions of the future, with only faint lights at the end of their stories.

As a definition, one would most strongly snap back that this is a potent political satire, but Bong Joon-ho himself provides a sobering perspective, having stated that he would not pick up a camera merely for the sake of political satire unless he could make it part of a more complex entity. So, what else is Mickey 17 besides that? It is a space film, as we are heading to another planet. It is science fiction, as we are cloning humans in it. It is a romance, as the story is strung upon a relationship. It is a social tableau, as it matters who gets onto the spaceship and how the very idea of this new kind of colonization arises in the first place. It is a political warped mirror, as the adventurers of politics appear in it in an exaggerated fashion, with their obsessed ideological drivel and nauseating toolkit, their painfully one-dimensional goals hidden behind falling masks. And it is a somber comedy, permeated by black humor playing with life and death.

The screenplay for Mickey 17 was written by Bong Joon-ho, based on Edward Ashton’s novel Mickey7, published in 2022. The film begins with a startling opening, in which our protagonist falls into a deep cave in a frozen landscape where certain death awaits him; however, his companion arriving there rescues not him, but only his weapon, while wishing him a good death and a goodbye until tomorrow during a pleasant chat. We learn through a flashback what happened: due to a collapsed business, the two friends see escaping loan sharks only by volunteering for an expedition preparing to colonize the planet Niflheim and fleeing Earth. However, there is a great crush, as they have many fellow sufferers with similar plans with whom they must compete to win a position ensuring the journey. Since Mickey is unskilled in everything, he signs up as an "Expendable" without reading what that actually entails. But anything could come, as he is haunted by the sound of the chainsaw with which the gangsters threatened him. Even these first scenes are permeated by a certain Baroque richness of references to cinematic precursors, as well as absurd humor (the chief loan shark is called Darius Blank), which becomes truly chilling in the sequences showing those gathering for the ship.

Specifically, the expedition is led by a failed politician named Kenneth Marshall, who, with the help of his fanatical followers, lobbied for support from some religious organization. The media workers arriving at the departure site interview his fanaticized supporters, who babble about a "pure planet." True, the reporter's questions already flew with phrases like "anti-migration" or "fixing the Earth." What sends a shiver down the viewer's spine is the scene's uncanny resemblance to what is seen in government programs on today’s television—whether in our country or in many others. I cannot deny that due to the bitter experiences of our past decades in Hungary, the resonance is much stronger, almost as if Bong Joon-ho had drawn from our own state propaganda as well. "One & Only"—proclaims the politician's slogan, the exclusivity of his own existence and truth. Meanwhile, the "Marshall business" flows with the hawking of various discount-purchasable items through loudspeakers, and in the corridors of the spiral structure, the flow of people inches toward the unknown like the students in The Wall into the gigantic meat grinder.



(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


Finally, our hero, who considers himself good for nothing, learns that his fate from then on is continuous death and rebirth. The method for this is that his body is reprinted within 20 hours following each demise from the compost of the spaceship's organic waste, into which his digitized memories, updated to the appropriate version number of his being, are uploaded. Poor Mickey indeed seems quite simple-minded, as even during the briefing, he can only focus on the scent of the woman's hair.

During the four-and-a-half-year journey, the travelers live under Orwellian total control inside the spaceship; the slightest transgression is sensed by the observers. Into the gray-green environment of walls and uniforms, the appearance of Marshall and his wife, Ylfa, brings color, driving their fans wild, while in Mickey, the question arises whether he is in the right place. Every restrictive measure only needs to be endured until arrival—so goes the promise, while the leading couple are hams and hedonists, as if they had remained with us from Ferreri’s La Grande Bouffe or some Pasolini film.



(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


Mickey, however, becomes acquainted with Nasha, one of the peacekeepers, and they fall in love, making the years of travel fly by more quickly. Their relationship is simultaneously grotesque and uplifting due to Mickey’s status, as the woman loves all Mickey versions, and she is the only one who realizes that for the man, dying might still be a terrifying experience; thus, she remains by his side during those moments. Speaking of death: everyone is curious about Mickey’s experience of it. The man only answers once, and even then, he says he doesn't know, because in the knowledge of his rebirth, his is not a true death.

His users think the same, exposing the man to shockingly cruel testing and experiments with total peace of mind. (One cannot help but think of infamous social-psychological experiments, such as the Milgram experiment.) Finally, upon arriving at the planet, they use a similar method to create the vaccine necessary to endure the atmosphere, while due to the casualties, Mickey reaches his 17th version. This is where we loop back to the opening scene, in which the man is supposed to die in the icy cave, but that is not what happens. Instead, something unexpected occurs: the indigenous inhabitants of the planet appear and save his life—except that in the meantime, Mickey 18 has already been printed, and the cardinal rule is that if two clone versions exist simultaneously, both must be permanently destroyed.


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


The further developments should remain the film's secrets, though it is clear that the two versions must figure out what to do with each other, Nasha with her doubled love, the inhabitants of the spaceship with their unfulfilled promises, Marshall—who increasingly pushes a Nazi ideology—with the realization of his phantasmagorias, and everyone with the planet's natives, who, despite their giant-bug-like appearance, seem more intelligent than the "crowns of earthly creation."


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


From all of this, the current problems preoccupying Bong Joon-ho emerge sharply, which most likely coincide with the questions of humanity’s still-thinking minority. The starting situation raises the question: how did we get ourselves into such a wretched position that for many, escaping the earthly habitat seems the only solution? How is it possible that we cannot reach an agreement even on moral issues such as human cloning, and there are always loopholes for the lunatics who circumvent sober considerations and find ways to use them for their own selfish interests? What a symbolic image it is: contrasted with the divine power capable of creating life from matter is the shoddy human solution that tries to play God by creating from waste and dross! What can be done with the human parasites whose rule is made possible by the suggestibility of the stupid, dazed masses? What kind of ideologies can man give birth to when power-madness clouds his brain? From Marshall's mouth, we hear the same phrases and bon mots being blustered that are voiced today by namable politicians and world leaders across the globe. How long can such obvious atrocities be lied to people's faces—that the planet's natives are the "aliens" who are obstacles to our (the intruders') expansion?

Bong Joon-ho’s satire presents a blood-curdling mixture of all this, and he crowns the total insanity by pouring a religious drivel over the ideological nonsense, turning the sum of the aforementioned into an all-pervasive, sticky, disgusting slime. Which, of course, is ridiculous exactly as it is, yet so real that I could only watch it with an increasingly tightening stomach—and I suspect I am not alone in this.



(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


Yet the director also does much to alleviate the tension; his images and scenes are often absurd to the point of provoking laughter (my favorite is the back-and-forth movement of the human figure during printing or its impossible postures), and he is not afraid to joke directly either, such as when he exposes the bluffing of the bug creatures.


(Author’s screenshot from Mickey 17.)


Bong Joon-ho's visuals are once again stunning in their color schemes and compositions. It was very interesting to see in a behind-the-scenes film the precision with which he shot, based on visual precursors pre-planned in storyboards. The design of the planetary inhabitants is also the work of the director and Jang Hee-chul; the two of them previously conceived the monster of The Host as well.

The credit for portraying all the Mickey variants and conveying their growing self-awareness goes to Robert Pattinson, who balances excellently on the razor's edge of the character's humorous and tragic traits. In the role of Nasha, Naomi Ackie serves as the story’s human (and female) compass to which one can align, never faltering in her judgments of situations or her emotions. The choice of Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette for the leading couple is a bullseye; they play these unhinged figures with such profound immersion. Reportedly, Bong Joon-ho’s request was for Ruffalo to knead his character together from many different types of dictators, yet the film's reviewers immediately and unequivocally claim to recognize Trump in him. To this, I would only say, in a more folksy manner, that "this isn't my first rodeo"—as I indicated above how I related it to my own domestic reality; thus, all these diverse precursors are indeed present.

Bong Joon-ho’s visuals are again bolstered by the music of Jung Jaeil, with whom he now forms a well-established creative duo. Jung's music is surprisingly lyrical but contains countless ideas. The romantic scenes are accompanied by soft, somewhat melancholic waltzes; often a piano solo dominates, which doubles just like Mickey 17 when he meets his 18th self. We hear Arabian melodies, the lulling sounds of a music box, and music reminiscent of gospel, tango, and klezmer, which occasionally surge forward to culminate in the atmosphere of a silent-film chase or demonstrate power with the blare of brass instruments. My favorite, however, is the magnificent musical idea where the planetary inhabitants are accompanied by the deeply and mystically resonating fundamental notes of throat singing and the whistling of overtones. Jung Jaeil’s musical solutions are extremely precise, and his thoroughness extends so far that he even saves a surprise for the very end of the credits. The characters of the film (Mark Ruffalo, Toni Collette, Daniel Henshall, and Anamaria Vartolomei) sing the biblical lines of "Rejoice in the Lord" to a klezmer-like melody, but in a way that sounds simultaneously like joy and lamentation—as if they were intoxicated by the joy of escaping the film’s dark vision, or perhaps by their sorrow at having to return to our earthly reality, where nothing remains for us but a deep faith in the victory of good. For us, it is important to note that a portion of the soundtrack was recorded in Budapest, Hungary.

Perhaps one should also write about the still-regularly heard croaking of those Western critics who express their resentment toward the unusual genre-blending of Eastern directors. But I will not, because I believe it is finally time to abandon these complaints—partly in the interest of recognizing and respecting creative freedom, and partly realizing that it is precisely these genre-mixtures that allow for a multifaceted exploration of a theme, and through their surprising associations of thought, they can greatly enhance the enjoyment value of a work.







Disclaimer: All images from Mickey 17 are property of the respective production studios and are used here under Fair Use for the purpose of criticism and review.


.  .  .  


This article was originally written in Hungarian for Ricemegatron Expert Film Blog and subsequently translated into English for Ricemegatron Expert: Korean Screen Insights. The English version was created with the assistance of Gemini AI, focusing on preserving the original tone, structure, and critical style of the author.